<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Bald Idea</title><link>http://bald-idea.blog.co.uk/</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://bald-idea.blog.co.uk/feed/rss2/comments/"/><description></description><language>en-EU</language><generator>MokoFeed</generator><ttl>10</ttl><item><title>In response to:Linux on the Desktop</title><link>http://bald-idea.blog.co.uk/2005/10/27/linux_on_the_desktop~264885/#c281091</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bald-idea.blog.co.uk,2005-10-27:/2005/10/27/linux_on_the_desktop~264885/#c281091</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:34:29 +0200</pubDate><description>The point is surely that the operating system should be a separate entity that the user need know nothing about. Users use applications. Much of the difficulty Windows gives users results from Microsoft attempting to force their applications on us by making them part of their operating system. I didn't want their film editing suite bundled with XP, it's dead weight to me, but if I decide to edit films on my PC I want to be able to choose any editor, and not have to fight the software already on my PC to get it to allow some other application to replace the one foisted on me.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But what do I know?</description><comments>http://bald-idea.blog.co.uk/2005/10/27/linux_on_the_desktop~264885/#c281091</comments></item></channel></rss>
